Page 120 - 《广西植物》2023年第10期
P. 120
1 8 7 4 广 西 植 物 43 卷
时间发生变化的模式有所不同ꎬ也体现出 3 个基 稻 AP2/ ERF 转录因子参与逆境胁迫应答的分子机制研
因在抗盐过程的不同功能ꎮ 通过与已知拟南芥抗 究进展 [J]. 作物学报ꎬ 48(4): 781-790.]
FARAJI Sꎬ FILIZ Eꎬ KAZEMITABAR SKꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. The
盐 AP2 / ERF 基因同源比对发现ꎬAvAP2 / ERF ̄56、
AP2/ ERF gene family in Triticum durum: genome ̄wide
AvAP2 / ERF ̄61 与 AvAP2 / ERF ̄80 3 个基因极有可
identification and expression analysis under drought and
能在盐胁迫诱导下提高表达量ꎬ进而响应及抵抗
salinity stresses [J]. Genesꎬ 11(12): 1464.
盐胁迫ꎮ qRT ̄PCR 验证发现 3 个基因在盐胁迫下 FENG Kꎬ HOU XLꎬ XING GMꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Advances in
表达模式与转录组数据一致ꎮ AP2/ ERF super ̄family transcription factors in plant
综上所述ꎬ本研究筛选鉴定了 86 个欧耧斗菜 [J]. Crit Rev Biotechnolꎬ 40(6): 750-776.
AP2 / ERF 基因ꎬ对家族成员进行了详细的特征分 GOU YLꎬ ZHANG Lꎬ GUO Hꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Research progress
on the AP2/ ERF transcription factor in plants [J]. Pratac
析与进化分类ꎬ结合转录组表达数据ꎬ对 AP2 / ERF
Sciꎬ 37(6): 1150 - 1159. [ 苟 艳 丽ꎬ 张 乐ꎬ 郭 欢ꎬ 等ꎬ
基因在盐胁迫下表达模式进行了总结ꎬ筛选出与
2020. 植物 AP2/ ERF 类转录因子研究进展 [J]. 草业科
盐胁 迫 相 关 的 候 选 基 因 3 个ꎬ AvAP2 / ERF ̄56、
学ꎬ 37(6): 1150-1159.]
AvAP2 / ERF ̄61 与 AvAP2 / ERF ̄80ꎬ可能在抵御盐胁 HONG Lꎬ YANG Lꎬ YANG HJꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Research
迫中发挥着重要作用ꎬ但具体基因功能仍需开展 advances in AP2/ ERF transcription factors in regulating
后续试验进行验证ꎮ plant responses to abiotic stress [J]. Chin Bull Botꎬ 55(4):
481-496. [洪林ꎬ 杨蕾ꎬ 杨海健ꎬ 等ꎬ 2020. AP2/ ERF 转
录因子调控植物非生物胁迫响应研究进展 [J]. 植物学
参考文献: 报ꎬ 55(4): 481-496.]
JESUS MBꎬ PEDRO JRꎬ JULIO MAꎬ 2015. Local adaptation to
AKHTER MSꎬ MOHAMMED Nꎬ KOUJ Sꎬ et al.ꎬ 2011. Gene distinct elevational cores contributes to current elevational
structuresꎬ classification and expression models of the AP2/ divergence of two Aquilegia vulgaris subspecies [J]. J Plant
EREBP transcription factor family in rice [ J]. Plant Cell Ecolꎬ 8(3): 273-283.
Physiolꎬ 52(2): 344-360. JOFUKU KDꎬ BOER BGꎬ MONTAGU MVꎬ et al.ꎬ 1994.
CARMEN MARTINELL Mꎬ LOPEZ ̄PUJOL JꎬBOSCH Mꎬ et Control of Arabidopsis flower and seed development by the
al.ꎬ 2010. Low genetic variability in the rareꎬ recently homeotic gene APETALA2 [ J ]. Plant Cellꎬ 6(9):
differentiated Aquilegia paui (Ranunculaceae) [J]. Biochem 1211-1225.
Syst Ecolꎬ 38(3): 390-397. KARABA Aꎬ DIXIT Sꎬ GRECO Rꎬ et al.ꎬ 2007. Improvement
CHENG MCꎬ LIAO PMꎬ KUO WWꎬ et al.ꎬ 2013. The of water use efficiency in rice by expression of HARDYꎬ an
Arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 regulates Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance gene [ J]. Pansꎬ
abiotic stress ̄responsive gene expression by binding to 104(39): 15270-15275.
different cis ̄acting elements in response to different stress KIDOKORO Sꎬ HAYASHI Kꎬ HARAGUCHI Hꎬ et al.ꎬ
signals [J]. Plant Physiolꎬ 162(3): 1566-1582. 2021. Posttranslational regulation of multiple clock ̄related
CHEN CJꎬ CHEN Hꎬ ZHANG Yꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. TBtools: an transcription factors triggers cold ̄inducible gene expression
integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big in Arabidopsis [J]. Pansꎬ 118(10): e2021048118.
biological data [J]. Mol Plantꎬ 13(8): 1194-1202. LIN RCꎬ PARK HJꎬ WANG HYꎬ 2008. Role of Arabidopsis
CHEN HLꎬ HU LLꎬ WANG LXꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Genome ̄wide RAP2.4 in regulating light ̄ and ethylene ̄mediated
identification and expression profiles of AP2/ ERF developmental processes and drought stress tolerance
transcription factor family in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) [J]. Mol Plantꎬ 1(1): 42-57.
[J]. J Appl Geneticsꎬ 63(2): 223-236. LIU JLꎬ DENG ZWꎬ LIANG CLꎬ et al.ꎬ 2021. Genome ̄wide
CHEN YHꎬ DAI YHꎬ LI YXꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Overexpression of analysis of RAV transcription factors and functional
the Salix matsudana SmAP2 ̄17 gene improves Arabidopsis characterization of anthocyanin ̄biosynthesis ̄related RAV
salinity tolerance by enhancing the expression of SOS3 and genes in pear [J]. Int J Mol Sciꎬ 22(11): 5567.
ABI5 [J]. BMC Plant Biolꎬ 22(1): 102. LIU PQꎬ SUN Fꎬ GAO Rꎬ et al.ꎬ 2012. RAP2.6L
CHEN Yꎬ SUN MZꎬ JIA BWꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Research progress overexpression delays waterlogging induced premature
regarding the function and mechanism of rice AP2/ ERF senescence by increasing stomatal closure more than
transcription factor in stress response [J]. Acta Agron Sinꎬ antioxidant enzyme activity [J]. Plant Mol Biolꎬ 79(6):
48(4): 781-790. [陈悦ꎬ 孙明哲ꎬ 贾博为ꎬ 等ꎬ 2022. 水 609-622.